CatDat

Implication Details

Assumptions: additiveeffective congruences

Conclusions: normal

Proof: Let i:YXi : Y \hookrightarrow X be a monomorphism. Then we define a relation on XX via EX×YE \coloneqq X \times Y with maps f,g:EXf, g : E \rightrightarrows X defined by f:(x,y)x+i(y)f : (x, y) \mapsto x+i(y) and g:(x,y)xg : (x, y) \mapsto x. It is straightforward to check that ff and gg are jointly monomorphic. Now EE is a congruence because for generalized elements x1,x2X(T)x_1, x_2 \in X(T), (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2) factors through EE if and only if x1x2x_1 - x_2 factors through YY. In other words, the relation on X(T)X(T) is exactly x1x2(modY(T))x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod{Y(T)}, which is an equivalence relation on X(T)X(T) (and in fact a congruence in Ab\Ab). Now by assumption, EE is the kernel pair of some morphism h:XZh : X \to Z; in other words, (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2) factors through EE if and only if h(x1)=h(x2)h(x_1) = h(x_2). In particular, for xX(T)x \in X(T), xx factors through YY if and only if (x,0)(x, 0) factors through EE, which is equivalent to h(x)=h(0)=0h(x) = h(0) = 0. We have thus shown that YY is the kernel of hh.

Show 7 categories using this implication