CatDat

Local ℵ₁-copresentability of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces

Our purpose here is to gather several relevant results about CompHaus\CompHaus, the category of compact Hausdorff spaces, and provide accessible (sic) proofs of these facts leading up to a proof that it is locally 1\aleph_1-copresentable.

A good overview of some of these results is contained in the introduction of HNN13.

We first prove a couple preliminary results.

Lemma 1.

Let I\I be a cofiltered category, and let X:ICompHausX : \I \to \CompHaus be a cofiltered diagram in which XiX_i is non-empty for each iIi\in \I. Then limiIXi\lim_{i\in \I} X_i is also non-empty.

Proof. Consider the product space iIXi\prod_{i\in \I} X_i. Now for each morphism f:ijf : i \to j in I\I, define the subset

Ef{xiIXiXf(xi)=xj}.\textstyle E_f \coloneqq \bigl\{ x \in \prod_{i \in \I} X_i \mid X_f(x_i) = x_j \bigr\}.

Then each EfE_f is a closed subset. Next, we prove that the collection {Ef:fMor(I)}\{ E_f : f \in \Mor(\I) \} has the finite intersection property, i.e. that fFEf\bigcap_{f\in F} E_f is non-empty for every finite set FMor(I)F \subseteq \Mor(\I). For fFf\in F we write f:ifjff : i_f \to j_f. Then the diagram with objects J{iffF}{jffF}J \coloneqq \{ i_f \mid f \in F \} \cup \{ j_f \mid f \in F \} and morphisms {ffF}\{ f \mid f \in F \} has a cone with vertex kIk \in \I and morphisms gi:kig_i : k \to i for each iJi \in J. Now choose yXky \in X_k, and define xiIXix \in \prod_{i \in \I} X_i such that xi=Xgi(y)x_i = X_{g_i}(y) if iJi \in J, with arbitrary choices of xiXix_i \in X_i for all other ii. We then see that xfFEfx \in \bigcap_{f\in F} E_f, which finishes the proof of the claim. Since iIXi\prod_{i \in \I} X_i is compact, that implies that the intersection of all EfE_f is non-empty. But that intersection is precisely limiIXi\lim_{i \in \I} X_i. \square

Lemma 2.

Suppose we have a cofiltered limit X=limiIXiX = \lim_{i\in \I} X_i in Top\Top. Note the topology on XX is the weak topology for the projections pi:XXip_i : X \to X_i. Then the canonical subbasis of this topology on XX is closed under finite intersections. Thus, it agrees with the canonical basis of the topology on XX.

Proof. Suppose we have a finite collection of subbasic open sets of the form Un=pin1(Vn)U_n = p_{i_n}^{-1}(V_n), n{1,,N}n \in \{ 1, \ldots, N \}, where each VnV_n is an open subset of XinX_{i_n}. Take a cone (j,fn:jin)(j, f_n : j \to i_n) of the objects i1,,iNi_1, \ldots, i_N. We then have

n=1NUn=pj1(n=1NXfn1(Vn)),\bigcap_{n=1}^N U_n = p_j^{-1} \left( \bigcap_{n=1}^N X_{f_n}^{-1}(V_n) \right),

where the right hand side is again in the canonical subbasis. \square

Proposition 3.

The functor Hom(,[0,1]):CompHausopSet\Hom({-}, [0, 1]) : \CompHaus^{\op} \to \Set is monadic. (Originally proved in Dus69)

Proof. We use the crude monadicity theorem (see e.g. SGL92, Thm. IV.4.2). First, the functor has a left adjoint S[0,1]SS \mapsto [0, 1]^S with the evident isomorphism

HomCompHaus(X,[0,1]S)HomSet(S,HomCompHaus(X,[0,1])).\Hom_{\CompHaus}\bigl(X, [0, 1]^S\bigr) \cong \Hom_{\Set}\bigl(S, \Hom_{\CompHaus}(X, [0, 1])\bigr).

To see the functor is conservative, suppose we have a continuous function f:XYf : X \to Y such that f:Hom(Y,[0,1])Hom(X,[0,1])f^* : \Hom(Y, [0, 1]) \to \Hom(X, [0, 1]) is a bijection. Then for any x1,x2Xx_1, x_2 \in X with x1x2x_1 \ne x_2, there exists φ:X[0,1]\varphi : X \to [0, 1] with φ(x1)=0\varphi(x_1) = 0 and φ(x2)=1\varphi(x_2) = 1 by Urysohn's lemma. Since ff^* is surjective, there exists ψ:Y[0,1]\psi : Y \to [0, 1] with φ=ψf\varphi = \psi \circ f; thus, we must have f(x1)f(x2)f(x_1) \ne f(x_2). Likewise, we know the image of ff is closed. If this image is not all of YY, then by Urysohn's lemma there exists nonzero φ:Y[0,1]\varphi : Y \to [0, 1] which is zero on the image. But then φf=0f\varphi \circ f = 0 \circ f, contradicting the injectivity of ff^*. Thus, ff is a bijective continuous function, and therefore a homeomorphism.

Finally, suppose we have a coreflexive equalizer pair

EiA gf BE \xhookrightarrow{i} A ~\overset{f}{\underset{g}{\rightrightarrows}}~ B

with r:BAr : B \to A. We may assume that ii is a subspace inclusion map. We may use rr to think of BB as a bundle of compact spaces over AA, with two sections f,gf, g. We then need to show that

Hom(B,[0,1]) gf Hom(A,[0,1])iHom(E,[0,1])\Hom(B, [0,1]) ~\overset{f^*}{\underset{g^*}{\rightrightarrows}}~ \Hom(A, [0, 1]) \xrightarrow{i^*} \Hom(E, [0, 1])

is a coequalizer diagram. We first define s:Hom(E,[0,1])Hom(A,[0,1])s : \Hom(E,[0,1]) \to \Hom(A,[0,1]) by choosing a Tietze extension of each continuous function E[0,1]E \to [0,1]. Now, for each φHom(A,[0,1])\varphi \in \Hom(A,[0,1]), we can define a continuous function on im(f)im(g)B\im(f) \cup \im(g) \subseteq B to be φr\varphi \circ r on im(f)\im(f), and s(i(φ))rs(i^*(\varphi))\circ r on im(g)\im(g). Note that on the overlap im(f)im(g)=f(E)=g(E)\im(f)\cap \im(g) = f(E) = g(E), the first expression gives f(e)φ(e)f(e) \mapsto \varphi(e), and the second expression gives g(e)s(i(φ))(e)=φ(e)g(e) \mapsto s(i^*(\varphi))(e) = \varphi(e), so we have indeed given a well-defined function on im(f)im(g)\im(f)\cup\im(g). Choosing a Tietze extension of this function to a function B[0,1]B\to [0,1] for each φ\varphi, we get a map t:Hom(A,[0,1])Hom(B,[0,1])t : \Hom(A,[0,1]) \to \Hom(B,[0,1]). By construction, we have is=idi^* s = \id, ft=idf^* t = \id, and gt=sig^* t = s i^*, so we have shown that the diagram above is a split coequalizer. \square

This shows that CompHausop\CompHaus^{\op} is equivalent to the category of algebras over the monad SHomCompHaus([0,1]S,[0,1]).S \mapsto \Hom_{\CompHaus}\bigl([0, 1]^S, [0, 1]\bigr). We may view such algebras as being models of the infinitary algebraic theory of all continuous functions [0,1]S[0,1][0,1]^S \to [0,1]. In fact, we can show that any such function only depends on countably many coordinates in the domain, so that operations of this theory will be generated by the continuous functions [0,1]ω[0,1][0,1]^\omega \to [0,1]. Indeed, we get the following somewhat stronger result:

Proposition 4.

The object [0,1][0,1] of CompHaus\CompHaus is 1\aleph_1-copresentable. (Originally proved in GU71, 6.5(c))

Proof. Suppose we have an 1\aleph_1-cofiltered limit X=limiIXiX = \lim_{i\in \I} X_i with projections pi:XXip_i : X \to X_i, and a continuous function φ:X[0,1]\varphi : X \to [0,1]. For the time being, fix nN>0n\in \IN_{>0}. Then for any xXx\in X, there exists an interval neighborhood NxN_x of φ(x)\varphi(x) of diameter at most 1/n1/n — for example, we can take Nx(φ(x)1/(2n),φ(x)+1/(2n))[0,1]N_x \coloneqq (\varphi(x) - 1/(2n), \varphi(x) + 1/(2n)) \cap [0,1]. We can also take a basic open neighborhood whose image is contained in NxN_x; by lemma 2, we can write that basic open neighborhood in the form pi1(V)p_i^{-1}(V) where VV is an open subset of XiX_i. By compactness of XX, we may take finitely many such basic open neighborhoods of the form pi1(V)p_i^{-1}(V) which cover XX. Again using the assumption that I\I is cofiltered, we may assume that ii is the same for each neighborhood. In particular, we see that whenever we have x,yXx, y\in X with pi(x)=pi(y)p_i(x) = p_i(y), then φ(x)φ(y)<1/n|\varphi(x) - \varphi(y)| < 1/n.

To summarize, we have shown that for each nN>0n \in \IN_{>0}, there exists iIi \in \I and a finite cover {VλλΛ}\{ V_\lambda \mid \lambda \in \Lambda \} of im(pi)\im(p_i) such that whenever pi(x),pi(y)Vλp_i(x), p_i(y) \in V_\lambda for some λ\lambda, we have φ(x)φ(y)<1/n|\varphi(x) - \varphi(y)| < 1/n. Now choose such a ini_n and associated finite cover of im(pin)\im(p_{i_n}) for each nn. Then use the fact that I\I is 1\aleph_1-cofiltered to take a cone (j,fn:jin)(j, f_n : j \to i_n) of the objects ini_n. We then see that whenever we have x,yXx, y\in X with pj(x)=pj(y)p_j(x) = p_j(y), then φ(x)=φ(y)\varphi(x) = \varphi(y). Thus, φ\varphi induces a well-defined function on the image of pjp_j. This function is continuous, since by construction for any nN>0n\in \IN_{>0} and xXx \in X, there is a neighborhood VV of pj(x)p_j(x) such that whenever pj(y)Vp_j(y)\in V as well, φ(y)φ(x)<1/n|\varphi(y) - \varphi(x)| < 1/n. By the Tietze extension theorem, this induced function can then be extended to a continuous function ψ:Xj[0,1]\psi : X_j \to [0,1]. Then φ=ψpj\varphi = \psi \circ p_j.

This shows the canonical map colimiIopHom(Xi,[0,1])Hom(limiIXi,[0,1])\textstyle \colim_{i\in \I^{\op}} \Hom(X_i, [0,1]) \to \Hom\bigl(\lim_{i\in \I} X_i, [0,1]\bigr) is surjective.

Likewise, suppose we have α,β:Xi[0,1]\alpha, \beta : X_i \rightrightarrows [0,1] such that αpi=βpi\alpha \circ p_i = \beta \circ p_i. For each nN>0n\in \IN_{>0}, consider the set Dn{xXiα(x)β(x)1/n}D_n \coloneqq \{ x \in X_i \mid |\alpha(x) - \beta(x)| \ge 1/n \}. Note that DnD_n is a closed subset of XiX_i, so it is compact. For any xDnx \in D_n, we must have xim(pi)x \notin \im(p_i). Using the contrapositive of lemma 1, we can conclude that there exists f:jif : j \to i such that x∉im(Xf)x \not\in \im(X_f). Indeed, suppose not: then the slice category I/i\I / i is cofiltered, with the limit over this slice category being the same as the limit over I\I. Also, by the contrary assumption, we have that xim(Xf)x \in \im(X_f) for any f:jif : j \to i, so Xf1({x})X_f^{-1}(\{ x \}) is non-empty. Therefore, by lemma 1, the limit pi1({x})p_i^{-1}(\{ x \}) would be non-empty, contradicting the assumption. Now each Dnim(Xf)D_n \setminus \im(X_f) is open and we have just shown such sets cover DnD_n; taking a finite subcover and then using the cofiltering assumption again, we conclude that there is a single fn:jnif_n : j_n \to i such that im(Xfn)\im(X_{f_n}) is disjoint from DnD_n. Using the 1\aleph_1-cofiltering assumption to take a cone of the fnf_n, we get that there is f:kif : k \to i such that im(Xf)\im(X_f) is disjoint from all DnD_n. This implies that αXf=βXf\alpha \circ X_f = \beta \circ X_f.

This shows the canonical map colimiIopHom(Xi,[0,1])Hom(limiIXi,[0,1])\textstyle \colim_{i\in \I^{\op}} \Hom(X_i, [0,1]) \to \Hom\bigl(\lim_{i\in I} X_i, [0,1]\bigr) is injective. \square

Corollary 5.

The category CompHaus\CompHaus is locally 1\aleph_1-copresentable.

Proof. It suffices to show that the monad SHomCompHaus([0,1]S,[0,1])S \mapsto \Hom_{\CompHaus}\bigl([0, 1]^S, [0, 1]\bigr) is 1\aleph_1-accessible. This functor is the composition of [0,1]:SetCompHausop[0, 1]^{-} : \Set \to \CompHaus^{\op} followed by HomCompHaus(,[0,1]):CompHausopSet.\Hom_{\CompHaus}({-}, [0,1]) : \CompHaus^{\op} \to \Set. The first automatically preserves 1\aleph_1-filtered colimits (and in fact all colimits) since it has a right adjoint. The second one preserves 1\aleph_1-filtered colimits by the previous lemma.

Alternately, applying the general framework of Lawvere theories shows that CompHausop\CompHaus^{\op} is equivalent to the category of functors TSet\T \to \Set preserving countable products, where T\T is the full subcategory of CompHaus\CompHaus of all spaces [0,1]A[0,1]^A where AA is countable. Note that T\T is essentially small. We thus reproduce a result from Isb82 which also provides a nice description of a small set of generators of the operations of the 0\aleph_0-ary algebraic theory. A more recent treatment in MR17 refines this by providing a nice axiomatization of the relations of that theory. \square

References

[Dus69]  J. Duskin, Variations on Beck’s tripleability criterion. Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar III, pages 74–129. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1969

[GU71]  P. Gabriel and F. Ulmer, Lokal präsentierbare Kategorien. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 221, 1971.

[Isb82]  J.R. Isbell, Generating the algebraic theory of C(X), Algebra Universalis, 15 (2):153–155, 1982

[SGL92]  Saunders Mac Lane and Ieke Moerdijk. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Universitext. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1992.

[HNN13]  Dirk Hoffman, Renato Neves, and Pedro Nora. Generating the algebraic theory of C(X): The case of partially ordered compact spaces. Theory and Applications of Categories, 33 (12):276–295, 2018. http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/12/33-12.pdf

[MR17]  Vincenzo Marra and Luca Reggio, Stone duality above dimension zero: Axiomatising the algebraic theory of C(X), Advances in Mathematics, 307:253–287, 2017

[HR19]  M. Hušek and J. Rosický, Factorization and local presentability in topological and uniform spaces, Topology and its Applications, 259:251–266, 2019

[MR20]  Vincenzo Marra and Luca Reggio, A characterisation of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces, 2020, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09738

Author: Daniel Schepler

Context

This page is referenced by the following categories.