Local ℵ₁-copresentability of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces
Our purpose here is to gather several relevant results about , the category of compact Hausdorff spaces, and provide accessible (sic) proofs of these facts leading up to a proof that it is locally -copresentable.
A good overview of some of these results is contained in the introduction of HNN13.
We first prove a couple preliminary results.
Let be a cofiltered category, and let be a cofiltered diagram in which is non-empty for each . Then is also non-empty.
Proof. Consider the product space . Now for each morphism in , define the subset
Then each is a closed subset. Next, we prove that the collection has the finite intersection property, i.e. that is non-empty for every finite set . For we write . Then the diagram with objects and morphisms has a cone with vertex and morphisms for each . Now choose , and define such that if , with arbitrary choices of for all other . We then see that , which finishes the proof of the claim. Since is compact, that implies that the intersection of all is non-empty. But that intersection is precisely .
Suppose we have a cofiltered limit in . Note the topology on is the weak topology for the projections . Then the canonical subbasis of this topology on is closed under finite intersections. Thus, it agrees with the canonical basis of the topology on .
Proof. Suppose we have a finite collection of subbasic open sets of the form , , where each is an open subset of . Take a cone of the objects . We then have
where the right hand side is again in the canonical subbasis.
The functor is monadic. (Originally proved in Dus69)
Proof. We use the crude monadicity theorem (see e.g. SGL92, Thm. IV.4.2). First, the functor has a left adjoint with the evident isomorphism
To see the functor is conservative, suppose we have a continuous function such that is a bijection. Then for any with , there exists with and by Urysohn's lemma. Since is surjective, there exists with ; thus, we must have . Likewise, we know the image of is closed. If this image is not all of , then by Urysohn's lemma there exists nonzero which is zero on the image. But then , contradicting the injectivity of . Thus, is a bijective continuous function, and therefore a homeomorphism.
Finally, suppose we have a coreflexive equalizer pair
with . We may assume that is a subspace inclusion map. We may use to think of as a bundle of compact spaces over , with two sections . We then need to show that
is a coequalizer diagram. We first define by choosing a Tietze extension of each continuous function . Now, for each , we can define a continuous function on to be on , and on . Note that on the overlap , the first expression gives , and the second expression gives , so we have indeed given a well-defined function on . Choosing a Tietze extension of this function to a function for each , we get a map . By construction, we have , , and , so we have shown that the diagram above is a split coequalizer.
This shows that is equivalent to the category of algebras over the monad We may view such algebras as being models of the infinitary algebraic theory of all continuous functions . In fact, we can show that any such function only depends on countably many coordinates in the domain, so that operations of this theory will be generated by the continuous functions . Indeed, we get the following somewhat stronger result:
The object of is -copresentable. (Originally proved in GU71, 6.5(c))
Proof. Suppose we have an -cofiltered limit with projections , and a continuous function . For the time being, fix . Then for any , there exists an interval neighborhood of of diameter at most — for example, we can take . We can also take a basic open neighborhood whose image is contained in ; by lemma 2, we can write that basic open neighborhood in the form where is an open subset of . By compactness of , we may take finitely many such basic open neighborhoods of the form which cover . Again using the assumption that is cofiltered, we may assume that is the same for each neighborhood. In particular, we see that whenever we have with , then .
To summarize, we have shown that for each , there exists and a finite cover of such that whenever for some , we have . Now choose such a and associated finite cover of for each . Then use the fact that is -cofiltered to take a cone of the objects . We then see that whenever we have with , then . Thus, induces a well-defined function on the image of . This function is continuous, since by construction for any and , there is a neighborhood of such that whenever as well, . By the Tietze extension theorem, this induced function can then be extended to a continuous function . Then .
This shows the canonical map is surjective.
Likewise, suppose we have such that . For each , consider the set . Note that is a closed subset of , so it is compact. For any , we must have . Using the contrapositive of lemma 1, we can conclude that there exists such that . Indeed, suppose not: then the slice category is cofiltered, with the limit over this slice category being the same as the limit over . Also, by the contrary assumption, we have that for any , so is non-empty. Therefore, by lemma 1, the limit would be non-empty, contradicting the assumption. Now each is open and we have just shown such sets cover ; taking a finite subcover and then using the cofiltering assumption again, we conclude that there is a single such that is disjoint from . Using the -cofiltering assumption to take a cone of the , we get that there is such that is disjoint from all . This implies that .
This shows the canonical map is injective.
The category is locally -copresentable.
Proof. It suffices to show that the monad is -accessible. This functor is the composition of followed by The first automatically preserves -filtered colimits (and in fact all colimits) since it has a right adjoint. The second one preserves -filtered colimits by the previous lemma.
Alternately, applying the general framework of Lawvere theories shows that is equivalent to the category of functors preserving countable products, where is the full subcategory of of all spaces where is countable. Note that is essentially small. We thus reproduce a result from Isb82 which also provides a nice description of a small set of generators of the operations of the -ary algebraic theory. A more recent treatment in MR17 refines this by providing a nice axiomatization of the relations of that theory.
References
[Dus69] J. Duskin, Variations on Beck’s tripleability criterion. Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar III, pages 74–129. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1969
[GU71] P. Gabriel and F. Ulmer, Lokal präsentierbare Kategorien. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 221, 1971.
[Isb82] J.R. Isbell, Generating the algebraic theory of C(X), Algebra Universalis, 15 (2):153–155, 1982
[SGL92] Saunders Mac Lane and Ieke Moerdijk. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Universitext. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1992.
[HNN13] Dirk Hoffman, Renato Neves, and Pedro Nora. Generating the algebraic theory of C(X): The case of partially ordered compact spaces. Theory and Applications of Categories, 33 (12):276–295, 2018. http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/12/33-12.pdf
[MR17] Vincenzo Marra and Luca Reggio, Stone duality above dimension zero: Axiomatising the algebraic theory of C(X), Advances in Mathematics, 307:253–287, 2017
[HR19] M. Hušek and J. Rosický, Factorization and local presentability in topological and uniform spaces, Topology and its Applications, 259:251–266, 2019
[MR20] Vincenzo Marra and Luca Reggio, A characterisation of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces, 2020, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09738
Author: Daniel Schepler
Context
This page is referenced by the following categories.