Structure

Implication details

Claim: If a category is Cauchy complete and is essentially countable and is locally finite, then it is ℵ₁-accessible.

Proof: The proof is similar to Makkai–Paré, Thm. 2.2.2 (which only establishes ℵ2\aleph_2-accessibility) and to MO/509853 (which concerns ℵ0\aleph_0-accessibility in the finite case).Let C\C be a category that is locally finite, essentially countable, and Cauchy complete. By replacing C\C with an equivalent category if necessary, we may assume that it is countable and that all Hom-sets are finite sets. Let I\I be an ℵ1\aleph_1-filtered category and let D:I→CD : \I \to \C be a diagram. We will prove that the colimit of DD exists and is a retract of some D(i)D(i), in fact for arbitrarily large ii. (Note that one cannot in general prove that it is isomorphic to some D(i)D(i); this is false.) It follows that ℵ1\aleph_1-filtered colimits exist and that every object of C\C is ℵ1\aleph_1-presentable.Let X∈CX \in \C be a fixed object. Then F≔Hom⁡(X,D(−)):I→FinSetF \coloneqq \Hom(X,D(-)) : \I \to \FinSet is a diagram of finite sets. Regard it as a diagram in Set\Set and let L∈SetL \in \Set be its colimit. Thus, for every i∈Ii \in \I we have maps ui:F(i)→Lu_i : F(i) \to L that are jointly surjective, and two elements in F(i)F(i) and F(j)F(j) become equal in LL iff there exists a cospan i→k←ji \to k \leftarrow j such that these elements map to the same element in F(k)F(k).We claim that LL is finite. Otherwise, there would exist infinitely many pairwise distinct elements l1,l2,…l_1,l_2,\dotsc in LL. Choose objects i1,i2,…∈Ii_1,i_2,\dotsc \in \I such that lnl_n has a preimage in F(in)F(i_n). Since I\I is ℵ1\aleph_1-filtered, there exists a cocone (in→j)n≥1(i_n \to j)_{n \geq 1} in I\I. We then obtain preimages a1,a2,…a_1,a_2,\dotsc in F(j)F(j), which must be pairwise distinct because l1,l2,…l_1,l_2,\dotsc are pairwise distinct. This contradicts the finiteness of F(j)F(j). Therefore, LL is finite.For every element of the finite set LL, choose a preimage in some F(i)F(i). Since I\I is filtered, there exists i∈Ii \in \I that works for all elements simultaneously. Equivalently, the canonical map F(i)→LF(i) \to L is surjective.Now consider the free cocompletion Y:C↪C^=[Cop,Set]Y : \C \hookrightarrow \widehat{\C} = [\C^{\op},\Set] and the colimit D∞∈C^D_\infty \in \widehat{\C} of the diagram Y∘DY \circ D. Since colimits in C^\widehat{\C} are computed objectwise, D∞(X)=colim⁡i∈IHom⁡(X,D(i)).D_\infty(X) = \colim_{i \in \I} \Hom(X,D(i)). We have shown above that D∞(X)D_\infty(X) is finite and that there exists some iX∈Ii_X \in \I such that the canonical map uiX(X):Hom⁡(X,D(iX))→D∞(X)u_{i_X}(X) : \Hom(X,D(i_X)) \to D_\infty(X) is surjective. Since C\C is countable and I\I is ℵ1\aleph_1-filtered, there exists a cocone (iX→j)X∈C(i_X \to j)_{X \in \C} in I\I. It follows that uj(X):Hom⁡(X,D(j))→D∞(X)u_j(X) : \Hom(X,D(j)) \to D_\infty(X) is surjective for all X∈CX \in \C. Equivalently, uj:Y(D(j))→D∞u_j : Y(D(j)) \to D_\infty is an epimorphism in C^\widehat{\C}. For every morphism j→j′j \to j', the map uj′u_{j'} is likewise an epimorphism. We will now show that some uj′u_{j'} is in fact a split epimorphism in C^\widehat{\C}.For every X∈CX \in \C, since uj(X)u_j(X) is a surjective map of finite sets, there exists a map v(X):D∞(X)→Hom⁡(X,D(j))v(X) : D_\infty(X) \to \Hom(X,D(j)) such that uj(X)∘v(X)=idD∞(X)u_j(X) \circ v(X) = \id_{D_\infty(X)}. The issue is that vv need not be natural in XX. To analyze this, let f:X→Yf : X \to Y be a morphism in C\C. Then we have a diagram of finite sets: D∞(Y)→v(Y)Hom⁡(Y,D(j))→uj(Y)D∞(Y)f∗↓f∗↓↓f∗D∞(X)→v(X)Hom⁡(X,D(j))→uj(X)D∞(X)\begin{CD} D_\infty(Y) @>{v(Y)}>> \Hom(Y,D(j)) @>{u_j(Y)}>> D_\infty(Y) \\ @V{f^*}VV @V{f^*}VV @VV{f^*}V \\ D_\infty(X) @>>{v(X)}> \Hom(X,D(j)) @>>{u_j(X)}> D_\infty(X) \end{CD} The outer rectangle commutes, and the square on the right commutes. Hence, the square on the left commutes after composition with uj(X)u_j(X). Since D∞(Y)D_\infty(Y) is finite, it follows that there exists some morphism j→j′j \to j' such that the left square commutes after composition with Hom⁡(X,D(j→j′)):Hom⁡(X,D(j))→Hom⁡(X,D(j′)).\Hom(X,D(j \to j')) : \Hom(X,D(j)) \to \Hom(X,D(j')). A priori, the index j′j' depends on the morphism f:X→Yf : X \to Y. However, since I\I is ℵ1\aleph_1-filtered and C\C has only countably many morphisms, we may choose j′j' independently of ff. Thus, by construction, w(X)≔Hom⁡(X,D(j→j′))∘v(X):D∞(X)→Hom⁡(X,D(j′))w(X) \coloneqq \Hom(X,D(j \to j')) \circ v(X) : D_\infty(X) \to \Hom(X,D(j')) is natural in XX. Moreover, uj′(X)∘w(X)=uj′(X)∘Hom⁡(X,D(j→j′))∘v(X)=uj(X)∘v(X)=idD∞(X).\begin{align*} u_{j'}(X) \circ w(X) & = u_{j'}(X) \circ \Hom(X,D(j \to j')) \circ v(X) \\ & = u_j(X) \circ v(X) = \id_{D_\infty(X)}. \end{align*} Therefore, uj′u_{j'} is a split epimorphism in C^\widehat{\C}. Since C\C is Cauchy complete, it follows that D∞D_\infty is representable, represented by a retract of D(j′)D(j'). Since YY is fully faithful, this object is a colimit of DD.

This implication has a dual.

Show 10 categories using this implication