CatDat

Meas\Meas is not regular

Claim.

The category Meas\Meas of measurable spaces and measurable maps is not regular.

Proof. In a regular category, regular epimorphisms are stable under pullbacks and compositions (see Prop. 3.7 at the nLab), which implies that for every regular epimorphism f:XYf : X \to Y also f×f:X×XY×Yf \times f : X \times X \to Y \times Y is a regular epimorphism. We will show that this fails in Meas\Meas.

Let X[0,1)X \coloneqq [0, 1) equipped with the standard Borel σ\sigma-algebra B\B. Consider the equivalence relation xy    xyQx \sim y \iff x-y \in \IQ, let YX/Y \coloneqq X /{\sim} be the set of equivalence classes, and f:XYf: X \to Y be the natural projection map. Equip YY with the quotient σ\sigma-algebra ΣY\Sigma_Y, so that ff is a regular epimorphism.

Now consider the diagonal in the quotient space ΔY{(y,y)yY}\Delta_Y \coloneqq \{(y, y) \mid y \in Y\}. Then (f×f)1(ΔY)={(x1,x2)[0,1)2x1x2Q}qQLq\textstyle (f \times f)^{-1}(\Delta_Y) = \{(x_1, x_2) \in [0, 1)^2 \mid x_1 - x_2 \in \IQ\} \eqqcolon \bigcup_{q \in \IQ} L_q where each LqL_q is the intersection of the diagonal level sets of x1x2x_1 - x_2 with [0,1)2[0, 1)^2. Because each line is closed in R2\IR^2, its intersection with [0,1)2[0, 1)^2 is a Borel set in X×XX \times X. Since a countable union of Borel sets is Borel, (f×f)1(ΔY)BB(f \times f)^{-1}(\Delta_Y) \in \B \otimes \B.

Now take any set BΣYB \in \Sigma_Y. Its preimage f1(B)f^{-1}(B) is a Borel set in [0,1)[0, 1) that is invariant under rational translations modulo 1. Because the action of Q/Z\IQ / \IZ on [0,1)[0, 1) is ergodic, the Lebesgue measure λ(f1(B))\lambda(f^{-1}(B)) must be exactly 00 or 11. Assume for contradiction that ΣY\Sigma_Y is countably separated, i.e. there exists a countable sequence of measurable sets (Bn)n1(B_n)_{n \geq 1} in ΣY\Sigma_Y that separates the points of YY. Let Anf1(Bn)A_n \coloneqq f^{-1}(B_n). Every AnA_n has λ(An)=0\lambda(A_n) = 0 or λ(An)=1\lambda(A_n) = 1.

Define a "bad set" N[0,1)N \subseteq [0, 1) as N(λ(An)=0An)(λ(An)=1Anc)\textstyle N \coloneqq \left( \bigcup_{\lambda(A_n)=0} A_n \right) \cup \left( \bigcup_{\lambda(A_n)=1} A_n^c \right) Because NN is a countable union of sets with measure 00, we have λ(N)=0\lambda(N) = 0, and thus λ([0,1)N)=1\lambda([0, 1) \setminus N)=1. For any two points x,y[0,1)Nx, y \in [0, 1) \setminus N, clearly xAn    yAnx \in A_n \iff y \in A_n for every nn. Consequently, the sequence (Bn)(B_n) fails to separate f(x)f(x) and f(y)f(y). Hence, xyx \sim y. Since [0,1)N[0, 1) \setminus N has measure 11, it is uncountable. Because each equivalence class is only countable, these uncountably many points must belong to uncountably many different equivalence classes. Thus, we can easily pick x,y[0,1)Nx, y \in [0, 1) \setminus N where x≁yx \not\sim y. Thus ΣY\Sigma_Y is not countably separated.

Hence by Theorem 6.5.7 in Bogachev's Measure theory ΔYΣYΣY\Delta_Y \notin \Sigma_Y \otimes \Sigma_Y. We have identified a non-measurable subset of Y×YY \times Y whose preimage under f×ff \times f is measurable. Therefore, f×ff \times f is not a regular epimorphism. \square

Author: Nekoma

Context

This page is referenced by the following categories.