Cocongruences on groups are effective
Our goal is to prove that every cocongruence in is effective. We will establish a more general result for categories in which pushouts and monomorphisms interact in a suitable way.
We shall say that a category has good pushouts of monomorphisms if it has pushouts of monomorphisms and if, for every diagram of monomorphisms
in which each square is a pullback, the induced morphism is also a monomorphism.
The category has good pushouts of monomorphisms.
Proof. Consider a diagram as above. We regard every monomorphism in it as an inclusion. Choose a system of representatives for the right -cosets in , meaning that the multiplication map is bijective. Likewise, choose such that the multiplication map is bijective. We may assume that and .
It is well known (see, for example, Serre's book Trees, Ch. I, §1, Thm. 1) that every element of the amalgamated free product has a unique representation of the form where , each lies either in or in , and these choices alternate.
The map
is injective. Indeed, if satisfy , then . Since , it follows that , and hence .
Therefore, we may extend to a system of representatives for the right -cosets in . Likewise, we may extend to a system of representatives for the right -cosets in .
With respect to these systems, an element written in normal form as above remains in normal form after being mapped to . This shows that the induced map is injective.
Let be a balanced category with good pushouts of monomorphisms and equalizers of monomorphisms. Then every cocongruence in is effective.
Proof. Let be an object, and let be a cocongruence. Since it is coreflexive, there exists a morphism satisfying
In particular, and are monomorphisms. Since the cocongruence is cotransitive, there exists a morphism
satisfying
where are the pushout inclusions satisfying . We will not use the fact that the cocongruence is cosymmetric; this will follow automatically. Consider the equalizer
of and . Since and agree on , there exists a unique morphism
defined by and , where are the two inclusions.
We must show that is an isomorphism. It is clearly an epimorphism, since and are jointly epimorphic by assumption. Since is balanced, it therefore suffices to prove that is a monomorphism.
We will show that even the morphism
is a monomorphism. It is characterized by
In other words, is induced by the diagram of monomorphisms
Since has good pushouts of monomorphisms, it suffices to verify that both squares are pullbacks. Observe that the two squares are symmetric, so it is enough to consider one of them. To verify the universal property, let and be morphisms satisfying . Applying , we obtain
Thus, is simply a morphism equalizing and , so it factors uniquely through .
Every cocongruence in the category is effective.
Author: Martin Brandenburg
Context
This page is referenced by the following categories.