Let C be the locally small category defined in this entry. Its objects are A, B, and every set X. The non-identity morphisms are f,g:A⇉B, uX:X→A and vX:X→B for every set X, and they satisfy the relation f∘uX=g∘uX=vX. We will give a concrete description of the small presheaves on C.
Let F be a presheaf on C. Concretely, this means that we are given sets F(A), F(B), and F(X) for every set X, two maps f∗,g∗:F(B)⇉F(A) and, for every set X, a map uX∗:F(A)→F(X) satisfying
uX∗∘f∗=uX∗∘g∗=vX∗,
where vX∗:F(B)→F(X). Thus, we have a commutative diagram
F(B)g∗⇉f∗F(A)uX∗F(X).
If this is a coequalizer diagram, we say that F is nice atX. In particular, uX∗ must be surjective. We say that F is nice if there is a set SF of sets such that F is nice at every set X∈/SF. We then call SF an exceptional set for F. Intuitively, this means that F is nice "almost everywhere".
Let us check that representable presheaves are nice.
When F=Hom(−,A), the diagram evaluates to
∅g∗⇉f∗{idA}uX∗{uX},
which is clearly a coequalizer diagram. Thus, this presheaf is nice everywhere.
When F=Hom(−,B), the diagram evaluates to
{idB}g∗⇉f∗{f,g}uX∗{vX},
which is again clearly a coequalizer diagram. Thus, this presheaf is nice everywhere.
When F=Hom(−,X) for a set X, the diagram at X evaluates to
∅g∗⇉f∗∅uX∗{idX},
which is not a coequalizer diagram. At Y=X, however, the diagram evaluates to
∅g∗⇉f∗∅uY∗∅,
which is a coequalizer diagram. Hence, the set {X} is an exceptional set for Hom(−,X).
Lemma 1.
A presheaf F on C is small if and only if it is nice.
Proof. The collection of nice presheaves is clearly closed under small colimits of presheaves, since colimits commute with colimits and colimits of presheaves are computed objectwise. Furthermore, we have seen above that representable presheaves are nice. It follows that every small presheaf is nice.
Conversely, assume that F is a nice presheaf and choose an exceptional set SF. To show that F is small, we will show that its category of elements ∫F has a small final subcategory. Let D be the full subcategory of ∫F consisting of the objects
(A,a) for a∈F(A),
(B,b) for b∈F(B),
(X,x) for x∈F(X) and X∈SF.
This is a small category since SF is a set.
We need to show that, for every object T∈∫F, the comma category T↓D is connected. This is trivial for objects T of D. It remains to check this for T=(X,x), where x∈F(X) and X∈/SF. By the definition of SF, the diagram
F(B)g∗⇉f∗F(A)uX∗F(X)(1)
is a coequalizer diagram. In particular, uX∗ is surjective, so there is some a∈F(A) with uX∗(a)=x. Then uX:(X,x)→(A,a) is a morphism in ∫F, showing that (X,x)↓D is non-empty.
There are two types of objects in (X,x)↓D. The first type consists of morphisms
uX:(X,x)→(A,a),
where a∈F(A) satisfies uX∗(a)=x. The second type consists of morphisms
vX:(X,x)→(B,b),
where b∈F(B) satisfies vX∗(b)=x. Every object of the second type is connected to an object of the first type, since f:(A,f∗(b))→(B,b) is a morphism with f∘uX=vX.
It remains to show that every two objects
(X,x)→(A,a),(X,x)→(A,a′)
are connected, where a,a′∈F(A) satisfy uX∗(a)=uX∗(a′)=x. Since the diagram (1) is a coequalizer diagram, there is a finite sequence of elements a0,…,an in F(A), where a0=a and an=a′, and a finite sequence of elements b0,…,bn−1∈F(B) such that, for every 0≤i<n, either
ai=f∗(bi),ai+1=g∗(bi),
or
ai=g∗(bi),ai+1=f∗(bi).
It suffices to show that (X,x)→(A,ai) and (X,x)→(A,ai+1) are connected. We may assume without loss of generality that
ai=f∗(bi),ai+1=g∗(bi).
But then both are connected to (X,x)→(B,bi) via the morphisms
f:(A,ai)→(B,bi),g:(A,ai+1)→(B,bi),
respectively. □
We can also characterize the presheaves G that are quotients of small presheaves (called petty presheaves in the literature). By Lemma 1, a necessary condition is that uX∗:G(A)→G(X) is surjective for "almost all" sets X. It turns out that this condition is sufficient as well.
Lemma 2.
Let G be a presheaf on C such that there is a set of sets S with the property that uX∗:G(A)→G(X) is surjective for all sets X∈/S. Then there is a small presheaf F with an epimorphism of presheaves F→G.
Proof. We define the presheaf
F:=a∈G(A)∐Hom(−,A)⊔b∈G(B)∐Hom(−,B)⊔X∈S,x∈G(X)∐Hom(−,X).
As a coproduct of representable functors, F is a small presheaf. By the Yoneda Lemma, there is a morphism α:F→G characterized by
αA(ia(idA))=a for a∈G(A)
αB(ib(idB))=b for b∈G(B)
αX(ix(idX))=x for X∈S, x∈G(X)
In particular, by construction, α hits all elements of G except possibly those x∈G(X) where X∈/S. But in this case, uX∗:G(A)→G(X) is surjective, and since α hits all elements of G(A), it also hits x. Thus, α is an epimorphism. □
Context
This page is referenced by the following categories.