Implication Details
Assumptions: countable products, equalizers
Conclusions: sequential limits
Reason: See Mac Lane, V.2, Prop. 3. The proof can easily be adapted to this case. Namely, the limit of is the equalizer of two suitable endomorphisms of .
Assumptions: countable products, equalizers
Conclusions: sequential limits
Reason: See Mac Lane, V.2, Prop. 3. The proof can easily be adapted to this case. Namely, the limit of is the equalizer of two suitable endomorphisms of .